Cervical spine clearance as evolved considerably over the years. First, there were five views of the spine using plain radiography. Then there were three. Then we moved to CT scan with clinical clearance. And currently, many institutions are relying only on CT.
But MRI has been used as an adjunct for quite some time. Initially, it was the tie breaker in patients who had equivocal CT findings, and for a while it was used for clearance in obtunded patients. And thanks to conflicting literature and disparate studies, the occasional usage became more frequent.
The group at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles noted that the percentage of patients undergoing MRI for cervical spine evaluation at their center slowly slowly crept up from 0.9% to 5.6% over a 10 year period. They designed a study to analyze the utility of this practice and inform their future practice.
Here are the factoids:
- Over 9,000 patients had cervical spine CT during the 10-year study period; 513 (5.6%) were positive
- Of the 513 CT-positive patients, 290 (56%) underwent an MRI. This showed:
- Confirmation of the major injury in 250
- Minor injury in 40
- Clinically significant injury was seen in only 2 which was no surprise since they both had neurologic deficits
- Of the 8,588 CT-negative patients, only 9 had clinically significant findings and 8 of them had neurologic deficits
Bottom line: So what have we learned here? First, MRI usage at Cedars-Sinai increased over time but was really not that useful. The main use was for imaging obtunded patients or those with an obvious neurologic deficit.
More than half of patients with positive CT scans also underwent MRI. If a major injury was seen on CT, MRI confirmed it. But if the CT findings were minor, none of the MRIs added any clinically significant findings in the absence of a neurologic deficit.
And what about MRI after negative CT? In the absence of a deficit, only one had a clinically significant finding (which only required a brace).
This study shows the wisdom of monitoring “how we do it.” There is sometimes some creepage away from what the literature shows is the best practice. The best way to remedy this is to do a good study, just like the authors did. They saw a slow change in practice, investigated it, and found that there was no good clinical reason for it. This gives the trauma program the ammunition to squelch the unwelcome behavior and return the clinicians to best practices.
Reference: Is MRI becoming the new CT for cervical spine clearance? Trends in MRI utilization at a Level I trauma center. J Tra publish ahead of print, DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002752, 2020.
Source: The Trauma Professionals’s Blog